A decade ago, the state-of-the-art computer simulation of moving water looked like the 0:20-0:40 segment of the Mafia I trailer. In the following years, the progress was relatively modest up to very recently.
PC games have become nearly photorealistic but flowing and splashing liquids are still hard. In some sense, one needs to simulate individual (enlarged) molecules and/or the Navier-Stokes equations – both tasks are difficult when it comes to the required computer power etc.
See also a lighthouse etc. and one more bunny bath.
The video above shows what the simulation of water looks like using the newest technologies. A single graphics card, GTX 580 which you may buy for $350, was used to produce the video in real time.
The video uses NVIDIA's Position Based Fluids: introduction, technical paper, pretty much the same approach that was used to simulate moving clothes and other things. See some examples how Mafia II exploited PhysX (2010).
The simulation with the bunny etc. looks almost perfect and some clever and efficient simulation of legitimate physics – especially a better iterative solver to maintain incompressibility – is responsible for this progress. Some additions are sort of cheating from a physics viewpoint, however. The tension-like filaments don't quite appear because of the right formulae for surface tension; they arise because of a new artificial pressure term that looks good but doesn't seem to be given by the right physics formulae.
Vorticity confinement is a new theme that allows to conserve the energy – which you may pump back to the system.
At any rate, because the water simulation looks almost perfectly realistic and water is among the most difficult things to simulate, we may say that we're pretty much entering the era in which your PC at home has all the required power and cleverness to produce videos of reality that may be indistinguishable from the real reality...
See Google News.
Incidentally, the gas explosion in Prague made it to the #1 event on Google News at some moment. (The explosion was caused either by gas or by Sarah Palin. ;-)) It seems excessive because nothing excessively serious has happened, after all. I should have debated some folks in the National Theater last Thursday but I said no at the end, partly because of preparations to a string/LHC mixed talk (2 hours including many questions) I was giving today in Pilsen. Note that the National Theater has burned twice – in the 19th century – and the Czechs always collected new funds to rebuild it. ;-)
The video above is somewhat more realistic and less sorrow because life didn't stop; this one or this one almost reminds me of my visits to Manhattan shortly after 9/11. You may imagine that I know the place extremely well – I am going around the National Theater almost every time when I visit Prague. There's also the Academy of Sciences where I was doing an exam with Prof Niederle as an undergrad and many other familiar buildings whose windows were broken today. ;-)
I suppose that when everyone can smell gas in the street, it's better to run away – and maybe some employees should try to stop the leak and/or extract the gas from the building in some way. I am no expert. It's not even clear to me whether someone breached his duties in any way – whether the existing regulations are supposed to prevent such events.
Prague is significantly richer than Pilsen but I feel that even the supposedly luxurious neighborhood of the National Theater is still sort of dirty relatively to Pilsen. Is it just me?
BTW Czech president Zeman offered one of his classic witticisms in Austria today. He said he's ready to terminate the expansion of our TemelÃn nuclear power plant – if Austria rents their Zwentendorf nuclear power plan (that was stopped by a modest 50.5% majority in a late 1970s referendum) – but cheaply. By this joke – which wouldn't necessarily have to be a joke if Austrians were a little bit more pragmatic! – Zeman joined the Start Zwentendorf NGO, a brotherly organization of the Austrian Stop TemelÃn NGO. ;-)
Maybe I shouldn't promote TemelÃn and its safety a few paragraphs after comments about a gas explosion in Prague? ;-) But I am really not afraid...
PC games have become nearly photorealistic but flowing and splashing liquids are still hard. In some sense, one needs to simulate individual (enlarged) molecules and/or the Navier-Stokes equations – both tasks are difficult when it comes to the required computer power etc.
See also a lighthouse etc. and one more bunny bath.
The video above shows what the simulation of water looks like using the newest technologies. A single graphics card, GTX 580 which you may buy for $350, was used to produce the video in real time.
The video uses NVIDIA's Position Based Fluids: introduction, technical paper, pretty much the same approach that was used to simulate moving clothes and other things. See some examples how Mafia II exploited PhysX (2010).
The simulation with the bunny etc. looks almost perfect and some clever and efficient simulation of legitimate physics – especially a better iterative solver to maintain incompressibility – is responsible for this progress. Some additions are sort of cheating from a physics viewpoint, however. The tension-like filaments don't quite appear because of the right formulae for surface tension; they arise because of a new artificial pressure term that looks good but doesn't seem to be given by the right physics formulae.
Vorticity confinement is a new theme that allows to conserve the energy – which you may pump back to the system.
At any rate, because the water simulation looks almost perfectly realistic and water is among the most difficult things to simulate, we may say that we're pretty much entering the era in which your PC at home has all the required power and cleverness to produce videos of reality that may be indistinguishable from the real reality...
See Google News.
Incidentally, the gas explosion in Prague made it to the #1 event on Google News at some moment. (The explosion was caused either by gas or by Sarah Palin. ;-)) It seems excessive because nothing excessively serious has happened, after all. I should have debated some folks in the National Theater last Thursday but I said no at the end, partly because of preparations to a string/LHC mixed talk (2 hours including many questions) I was giving today in Pilsen. Note that the National Theater has burned twice – in the 19th century – and the Czechs always collected new funds to rebuild it. ;-)
The video above is somewhat more realistic and less sorrow because life didn't stop; this one or this one almost reminds me of my visits to Manhattan shortly after 9/11. You may imagine that I know the place extremely well – I am going around the National Theater almost every time when I visit Prague. There's also the Academy of Sciences where I was doing an exam with Prof Niederle as an undergrad and many other familiar buildings whose windows were broken today. ;-)
I suppose that when everyone can smell gas in the street, it's better to run away – and maybe some employees should try to stop the leak and/or extract the gas from the building in some way. I am no expert. It's not even clear to me whether someone breached his duties in any way – whether the existing regulations are supposed to prevent such events.
Prague is significantly richer than Pilsen but I feel that even the supposedly luxurious neighborhood of the National Theater is still sort of dirty relatively to Pilsen. Is it just me?
BTW Czech president Zeman offered one of his classic witticisms in Austria today. He said he's ready to terminate the expansion of our TemelÃn nuclear power plant – if Austria rents their Zwentendorf nuclear power plan (that was stopped by a modest 50.5% majority in a late 1970s referendum) – but cheaply. By this joke – which wouldn't necessarily have to be a joke if Austrians were a little bit more pragmatic! – Zeman joined the Start Zwentendorf NGO, a brotherly organization of the Austrian Stop TemelÃn NGO. ;-)
Maybe I shouldn't promote TemelÃn and its safety a few paragraphs after comments about a gas explosion in Prague? ;-) But I am really not afraid...
PhysX PBF: breakthrough in simulation of water
Reviewed by DAL
on
April 28, 2013
Rating:
Reviewed by DAL
on
April 28, 2013
Rating:
No comments: